Cornell Law Review🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ Immigration Venue Exceptionalism
• ↓ Resistance Through Restraint: Liberal Cause Lawyering in an Age of Conservative Judicial Hegemony
• ↓ Administrative Procedural Discretion
• ↓ The Federal Reserve as the World’s Unofficial Central Bank
• ↓ Whose History, Which Tradition? An Examination of Historical Sources in the Supreme Court’s History-and Tradition Jurisprudence
• ↓ Cornell Law Review
• ↓ Top Alternatives to cornelllawreview.org

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from cornelllawreview.org

Content Snippets from cornelllawreview.org

"†Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School. This Article was generously supported by the Brooklyn Law School Dean’s Summer Research Stipend. This Article benefited enormously from the research assistance of Cristina Coudert Lynch, BLS ‘26, and Jean Davis, International and Foreign Law Reference Librarian."

"††Suzanne J. and Norman Miles Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School."

"The notion of “exceptionalism” has characterized immigration law for more than a century. Many constitutional and other traditional norms do not apply in the realm of immigration law. Venue, as prescribed and practiced in Immigration Courts, is yet another example of outlier conduct. Venue, a standard litigation norm, has been seriously perverted. Instead of protecting…"

"I thank the editors of the Cornell Law Review for their meticulous edits, especially Vanna Carter. For thoughtful conversation, I thank Reva Siegel, Doug NeJaime, and Robert Post, as well as the participants in the Yale Law School Public Law Workshop, and the Stanford Law Journals Discussion Group."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for cornelllawreview.org:

Immigration Venue Exceptionalism

Resistance Through Restraint: Liberal Cause Lawyering in an Age of Conservative Judicial Hegemony

Administrative Procedural Discretion

The Federal Reserve as the World’s Unofficial Central Bank

Whose History, Which Tradition? An Examination of Historical Sources in the Supreme Court’s History-and Tradition Jurisprudence

Cornell Law Review