Isdp Domain Overview🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ Who Leads the Ummah? The Mecca Pact Says Everyone–and No One
• ↓ What Does the CISPA Case Tell Us About Research Security and Cooperation with China? An Interview with Dr. Alicia Hennig
• ↓ FACT SHEET ON CHINA-MYANMAR-BANGLADESH ECONOMIC CORRIDOR
• ↓ Bang for the Buck? Reassessing NATO’s 5 Percent Benchmark Through Comparative Defense Accounting
• ↓ The Missing Strategy in Europe’s Reindustrialization: Lessons from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
• ↓ Silk Cage Webinar Report: Ports, Power, and Political Access: China’s Strategic Grip over Sri Lanka
• ↓ Top Alternatives to isdp.eu

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from isdp.eu

Content Snippets from isdp.eu

"Saroj Kumar Aryal and Adithyan Nair write in this issue brief that the Mecca defense pact’s immediate significance lies primarily in political coordination, deterrence, intelligence sharing, and defense cooperation rather than the creation of an integrated military alliance. The pact faces structural constraints arising from divergent threat perceptions, competing regional ambitions, overlapping alliances, and differing strategic priorities among its members. Nevertheless, its formation carries wider implications for Iran, the United States, Israel, and India, argue Aryal and Nair. Potential expansion of the pact could generate a regional balancing effect, encouraging India, Israel, and the UAE to deepen their existing strategic cooperation while increasing U.S. involvement, Aryal and Nair write further. Read and download this brief here."

"In this expert interview conducted by Melita Phachulia, Executive Assistant at the Institute for Security and Development Policy (ISDP), Dr. Alicia Hennig, Associated Senior Research Fellow at ISDP, examines what the Helmholtz Center for Information Security (CISPA) case reveals about the changing landscape of research security and international scientific cooperation. European institutions face the challenge of preserving openness and collaboration while protecting sensitive knowledge and technologies. Hennig argues that the debate has become particularly prominent regarding cooperation with China. While international research partnerships have contributed significantly to scientific progress, concerns have grown over issues such as technology transfer, state influence within academic institutions, and the strategic use of research cooperation. Read and download this expert interview here."

"Want to know more about China’s ever-increasing strategic influence in the Bay of Bengal? Here is a Fact Sheet, part of the Stockholm Center for South Asian and Indo-Pacific Affairs (SCSA-IPA) research project, The Silk Noose: China’s Power Architecture in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region. This fact sheet analyses that China has undertaken several projects to increase its role in the Bay of Bengal region and circumvent the Malacca Strait. This has been done through the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), including investments in port infrastructure and multiple new economic corridors. One of these corridors was the Bangladesh, China, India and Myanmar Economic Corridor (BCIM), which, following Indian disengagement, has evolved into the China-Myanmar-Bangladesh Economic Corridor (CMBC). Download and read this fact sheet here."

"This issue brief by Pierre Erik Gunnarsson argues that headline expenditure figures are an incomplete measure of national defense effort among NATO members. Drawing on official data, it examines how institutional differences shape international comparison. It focuses particularly on defense research and development, where the United States sustains an innovation ecosystem characterized by high technological ambition, tolerance of program failure, and correspondingly higher costs. The Zumwalt-class destroyer program illustrates both the opportunities and pitfalls of this approach. Gunnarsson shows that meaningful comparison requires attention to the broader public-finance context. He concludes that assessments of allied burden sharing should distinguish between headline defense expenditure, defense-related public expenditure, and the military capability generated per unit of spending—referred to here as “bang for the buck.” Read and download this issue brief here."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for isdp.eu:

Who Leads the Ummah? The Mecca Pact Says Everyone–and No One

What Does the CISPA Case Tell Us About Research Security and Cooperation with China? An Interview with Dr. Alicia Hennig

FACT SHEET ON CHINA-MYANMAR-BANGLADESH ECONOMIC CORRIDOR

Bang for the Buck? Reassessing NATO’s 5 Percent Benchmark Through Comparative Defense Accounting

The Missing Strategy in Europe’s Reindustrialization: Lessons from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan

Silk Cage Webinar Report: Ports, Power, and Political Access: China’s Strategic Grip over Sri Lanka