¶ The Laboratorium (3d ser.)🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ A blog by James Grimmelmann Soyez réglé dans votre vie et ordinaire comme un bourgeois afin d'être violent et original dans vos oeuvres.
• ↓ 1. Background
• ↓ 2. Kotlikoff’s May 15 Statement
• ↓ 3. The Board’s May 15 Statement
• ↓ 4. About the Other Individuals
• ↓ Conclusion
• ↓ Top Alternatives to laboratorium.net

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from laboratorium.net

Content Snippets from laboratorium.net

"Here’s a simple taxonomy for thinking about academic duties and freedoms. There are basically three kinds of reasons why a university could take disciplinary action against an academic:"

"Note what isn’t on this list: “You were hired to do X and you also did Y.” Doing something not in the job description cannot by itself be grounds for discipline, because that would destroy academics’ freedom when they act as citizens and as private individuals. Philosophers and chemists can advocate for nuclear disarmament; mathematicians can publish novels; art historians can have long-running feuds with their neighbors. It would be absurd to say that all of them violated their academic obligations by doing things outside of their fields. That’s called being a person and having a life."

"Similarly, it is not disqualifying by itself to work on academic projects outside of one’s discipline or contracted role. An antitrust scholar can write on family law; a geologist can write on diplomatic history. Indeed, it mostly doesn’t matter whether these side hustles are good or not—that is for the family lawyers and the diplomatic historians to judge, and the consequences of their judgment are mostly confined to where these works are published and to how much note the academic community takes of them. If your geology is amateurish, the geology department should deny you tenure. If your diplomatic history is amateurish, the geology department mostly shouldn’t care."

"Instead, these frolics become relevant only when and only to the extent that they constitute nonfeasance, misfeasance, or malfeasace—that is, when they either so interfere with the job you were hired to do that they result in you not doing it (nonfeasance) or doing it badly (misfeasance), or seriously interfering with the university’s other work (malfeasance). But, and this is the point to underline, they must be judged by the standards of those other tests."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for laboratorium.net:

A blog by James Grimmelmann Soyez réglé dans votre vie et ordinaire comme un bourgeois afin d'être violent et original dans vos oeuvres.

1. Background

2. Kotlikoff’s May 15 Statement

3. The Board’s May 15 Statement

4. About the Other Individuals

Conclusion